WHEN IT COMES TO REVEALING POSSIBLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WHEN REPORTING ON  AND/OR DISCUSSING  THE NEWS I AM IN FAVOR OF 100% DISCLOSURE.

 However, this thorough and public disclosure should be universal.

 For example, Ruth Marcus’  husband was a prominent official in the Obama administration.  Benjamin Rhodes brother was president of a major pro Obama network. These relationships were never reported when these and other individuals appeared for interviews on PBS or on the major networks. Martha Raddatz has had deep family and social connection with the Clintons and with the Obamas.

The Jewish Journal roundtable had four entries discussing Sean Hannity with  the title: “what does  Sean Hannity scandal say about Fox news?” The headline itself exhibits bias by using the word “scandal”.  And, all four entries are negative.

Yet, similar  fair questions concerning Rod Rosenstein, James Comey, Robert Mueller, John Brennan [who have  much hidden in their history and many more  troubling conflicts of interest ]remain, for the most part unexplored by the mainstream media.

 For example immediately below  are some materials relating to the political orientation and activities of Rod Rosenstein’s wife, Lisa H Barsoomian . Obviously, these materials have been obtained from right of center sources… However, the   facts presented are correct and the questions raised are legitimate.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST ROD ROSENSTEIN:
Rod Rosenstein has no business involving himself in the Hillary Clinton-DNC funded Steele dossier, and the ongoing Russia investigation.
Much less the selection of his mentor and his wife’s mentor Robert Muller as Special Counsel.

impartiality? that appears  impossible.
The rules of ethics “required his recusal."
But there was no such recusal.

Why does Lisa H Barsoomian  merit any mention?…..BECAUSE…..Lisa H Barsoomian is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE

Lisa H Barsoomian   BACKGROUND.

Lisa H Barsoomian a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law,  she’s a protege of James Comey and Robert Muller

Barsoomian with her boss R Craig Lawrence represented Bill Clinton in 1998
Lawrence also represented
Robert Muller three times
James Comey five times
Barack Obama 45 times
Kathleen Sebelius 56 times
Bill Clinton 40 times and
Hillary Clinton 17 times

between 1998 and 2017
Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times



Lisa H Barsoomian CONCERNS:

Someone  “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals court dockets (?)

Someone “purged”  of the internet of  all information pertaining to Barsoomian.
Historically this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.
Additionally Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community.

And although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases re
presenting the DC Office of the US Attorney her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.

This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

Does an attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter.


We believe that it does when it deals with Trump and his
recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports,
the border wal
DACA,
everything coming out of California,
the Uniparty unrelenting opposition to President Trump,                                          
the Clapper leaks,
the Comey leaks,
Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal ....
Muller’s  investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians

Why does Barsoomian,  as a CIA operative, merit special  mention?…..BECAUSE…..Lisa H Barsoomian is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE.

Barsoomian’s loyalties appear to be biased  (tainted?).
Could this have influenced Rosenstein?
This clearly violates the appearance of impropriety attorney’s rules?
Both owe their careers as US attorneys to Muller, Obama, Bush, and the Clintons.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST ROD ROSENSTEIN:
Rod Rosenstein has no business involving himself in the Hillary Clinton-DNC funded Steele dossier, and the ongoing Russia investigation.
Much less the selection of his mentor and his wife’s mentor Robert Muller as Special Counsel.

impartiality? that appears  impossible.
The rules of ethics “required his recusal."
But there was no such recusal.

 REFERRALS FOR FURTHER READING: Caution advised, many of these may be biased…


https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2017/05/proof-robert-mueller-cannot-be.html#rosenstein-conflict
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2017-05-22-Lisa-Barsoomian-represented-William-J-Clinton-98-cv-01459-TPJ-06-11-1998-PACER-accessed-May-22-2017.pdf
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2017-05-20-R-Craig-Lawrence-DC-Appeals-Court-Docket-PACER-accessed-May-20-2017.pdf



 WHAT DOES THE SEAN HANNITY SCANDAL SAY ABOUT FOX NEWS?
President Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, found himself on the wrong side of a courtroom Monday after the FBI raided his offices last week. In determining the fate of the seized documents from the raid, Cohen was forced to reveal the name of one of his clients – Sean Hannity – a prominent Fox News host who vehemently condemned the FBI’s raids on Cohen, but who never disclosed his own personal relationship with him. More at Vox.
Journalist or Activist: Hannity Must Choose
Michael Calderone, Politico:
“
Sean Hannity has wavered over the years on whether he is a journalist or conservative activist, but ethics specialists say that whichever hat the Fox News host was wearing last week when he condemned the FBI raid on attorney Michael Cohen’s office, he should have disclosed that he’s a client of Cohen’s.

News Outlet or GOP Outlet: Fox Has Crossed the Line
David A. Graham, The Atlantic:
“
Fox News has always been a de facto ally of the Republican Party, but Hannity’s closeness with Trump is a symptom of an even closer relationship between this administration and the channel. Hannity and the president speak frequently, and Trump seems to take his advice seriously on a wide range of topics, even as he tends to disregard advice from specialist aides. That relationship is already far closer than most news organizations would find acceptable.

Deceptive or Fool: Hannity is at Least One of the Two
Becket Adams, Washington Examiner:
“
…the criticism here isn’t that Hannity gave his opinion, or that he acted as a partisan. The criticism is that he failed to disclose an obvious conflict of interest. Reporters and pundits may operate by different standards, but we expect full disclosure from both as far as personal ties are concerned. Hannity failed on this count, leaving one to wonder whether the omission was willful deception or simple ignorance.