WALL STREET JOURNAL HAS JOINED THE FAKE  NEWS MEDIA

RE: “Barr Says He Is Fighting for the Presidency, Not Trump” by  Sadie Gurman ,Wall Street JournalUpdated May 20, 2019 7:00 p.m. ET

https://www.wsj.com/articles/barr-under-fire-says-hes-fighting-for-the-presidency-not-trump-11558389922?mod=itp_wsj&mod=&mod=djeSince then, Mr. Barr has been in lockstep with Mr. Trump’s priorities.mITP_h

Sadie Gurman  of the Wall Street Journal demonstrates that the Wall Street Journal has, in many articles,  joined the fake news  media [in presenting personal opinion as news facts].

Until Wall Street Journal re-institutes strict editorial control over its reporting , MIL-ED, regretfully, must treat every article in the Wall Street Journal with Suspicion.

Ms. Gurman should acknowledge that there are many thousands of former federal prosecutors and those who have been willing to sign petitions that are against Atty. Gen. Barr constitute only a fraction of 1% of those with active law enforcement and/or intelligence experience.

Ms Gurman misquotes the carefully crafted and  leaked letter of special counsel Mueller. 

Examples

“It’s an affront to everyone who worked on that case and who supported it, and to everyone who works counterintelligence in general,” said Frank Montoya, a former top counterintelligence agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation”

“Since then, Mr. Barr has been in lockstep with Mr. Trump’s priorities.”

“Mr. Barr’s detractors said his concern for executive power doesn’t explain all of his actions on behalf of Mr. Trump. The attorney general has a responsibility to ensure the president’s powers are not eroded, but also to uphold the constitutional system of separation of powers, said Walter Dellinger, who succeeded Mr. Barr in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel under Bill Clinton, where he softened a Barr opinion on congressional intrusions on the presidency “because it seemed too blunt and insufficiently respectful of the role of Congress.”

“Protecting the president who has violated his oath of office and probably the criminal code is not an application of a strong view of executive power,” Mr. Dellinger said. “That’s just wrong.”

“Critics, including hundreds of former Justice Department lawyers, are still reeling over the way he released Mr. Mueller’s report, initially sending out a four-page letter that many thought was designed to clear Mr. Trump without taking account of some of Mr. Mueller’s most serious findings. Mr. Mueller also took issue, writing a pair of letters expressing concern that the early synopsis risked undermining public confidence in his investigation.”

YES…THERE IS A PROVABLE CASE OF “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE”….  BUT  THE PERPETRATORS ARE ANDREW WEISMANN AND ROBERT MUELLER

The prosecutors offered Corsi  a plea deal in lieu of indicting him IF he  provided a  link to connect Roger Stone and Donald Trump to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. The choice they gave Corsi was to plead guilty to one count with the prosecutors’ agreement they would seek no prison term, OR  to  reject their  deal and spend possibly $2 million that he did not have to defend himself in a federal criminal case  before a hostile Washington jury that he was sure to lose that would result in a 25-year prison term. Since Corsi was 72 years old at the time,  a prison term of that length would have meant he was likely to die in federal prison.THERE IS A PROVABLE CASE OF “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE”…. THE PERPETRATORS ARE ANDREW WEISMANN AND ROBERT MUELLER